It has been passed for ten years since a person worked.
He was over 30 years old. He was not interested in working so much or he was
not special hobby. He was unmarried and
a single. He lived independently from his family, and he felt it abnormal that
the thin human relationship was built. He has no friend, although he made some
communication with his colleagues and sometimes he went drinking with them.
Nevertheless, he was not interested in doing so. He just did so because it was
custom. He thought that he should not make personal relationship in a company.
Thus, it was natural that he did not have any rivalry relationship or
solidarity with his colleagues.
He might have feelings to build the human relationship
that needs to consider introspection of other people. Yet, he might not know
how to build such kind of relationship, and he might not want to be involved in
annoying psychological problems. He said that he had never met the person who
was interested in. It can be the problem of his sensitivity or he can believe
that he was not an interesting person. As I discussed before, conflicts
presuppose relationship. If this is true, then there is no conflict in this
case. Is it true or is it preferable due to no conflict? I define this situation;
there is no relationship, as a pre-conflict stage.
It is a global phenomenon that in sociological field,
thin human relationship became a hot topic. People who feel loneliness in the
city are not a few. There are people who have a lot of friends, although they
cannot build interpersonal relationship in the inner level. It can be one
leading question to analyze the phenomenon why people have to build this
interpersonal relationship.
To begin with the analysis of this question, I will
discuss the opposite case.
It is how people can build
good emotional relationship. The key factors I assume are respect, love,
empathy, and compassion. These emotional factors can be produced by personal
relationship. Fellow feeling can be one of the opposite as well. It is, however,
I will not analyze because this feelings are indirect feelings these are
produced via organization. Conflicts between organizations will be argued in
the next chapter. It seems to be unreasonable that recognizing the opposite
notion from the philosophy of conflicts as good. Yet, I hypothesize this as
good temporally.
Respecting
people are feelings come out with jealousy and envy evaluated by some specific
values and perspectives. Empathy is produced by pleasure elicited by sharing
some specific values each other. Values in this context are not limited by the
representation of language. It can be value which is expressed by arts or
nonverbal activities. It can be better to be understood to say “the world”
instead of values. Attachment with “the world” can produce special ties between
people.
Friendships or compassion are not the things to be
discovered. These are born and raised unconsciously. I think that it might not
be an appropriate example; however, I argue the case of loving dog. Who will
ask the values=the world to a dog in feeling compassion with a dog? My point is
not to say that the creature must be respected equally but my point for this
example is to love what or not to love what is the matter to be argued by
human’s wisdom. It does not seem to be plausible to elucidate these questions
if the neuroscience might develop incredibly. Rather, considering the statement
what is has to be loved is in vain. It would express the deficiency of the
decency toward the love.
Interpersonal relationships—defined as inner
relationships with people—can be the origin of the conflict and the pleasure.
Would it be better to say that it is the origin of the chaos? In other words,
pleasure, sadness and angry are originated in the chaos. Would it be fair to
say that it is the essential part of the human beings?
If it is true, then I can conclude that absence of the
human relationship is pre-conflict from the interpersonal conflict
perspectives. It is; however, fair to say that the structure of the phenomenon
is conflict against a life.
No comments:
Post a Comment